The Pro Bowl has a credibility issue. Players are openly criticizing it, including Giants offensive lineman Jermaine Eluemenor, who tweeted, “No hate but the Pro Bowl a joke lol. [Andrew Thomas] Top LT in the NFL hasn't made one yet but if you're popular you get in. Laughable at this point.”

Three-time Pro Bowl linebacker Shawne Merriman remarked, “The Pro Bowl used to be a badge of honor and respected. Things have changed.”

Merriman insisted that his comments were not directed at any specific player, although Eluemenor referenced better players who deserved the selection more than the latest replacements. For example, Shedeur Sanders was named to the Pro Bowl as a replacement selection.

Let’s clarify: this is not a criticism of Shedeur Sanders. He has faced significant criticism for issues beyond his control. He is simply a rookie thrust into a challenging situation—behind a shaky offensive line and surrounded by an underwhelming receiving corps. Yet, his performance this season does not warrant a Pro Bowl selection.

His touchdown-to-interception ratio of seven touchdowns to ten interceptions is among the worst in the league.

This isn’t just about Sanders, as the wide range of replacements in the Pro Bowl demonstrates how the event has lost its relevance and credibility. The NFL should consider differentiating between initial selections and replacements to restore some respect to the Pro Bowl designation.