The latest discussion surrounding the College Football Playoff (CFP) continues to reflect stagnation, with no significant changes anticipated until the 2026 season. Currently, college football stakeholders, including conference commissioners, conduct meetings regarding future playoff structures—but these discussions yield little in terms of actionable outcomes.

Current Landscape

Last week, an update from the CFP indicated that the selection committee met in Grapevine, Texas, to assess their responsibilities, yet no new developments emerged from these discussions. This pattern of inactivity raises questions about the effectiveness of repeated meetings, especially as decision-making authority is set to shift significantly to the Big Ten and SEC in 2026.

Looking Ahead

There is a belief that the motive behind these frequent meetings might be a flicker of hope for compromise that could afford smaller conferences an opportunity to influence decisions. However, with substantial alterations in team formatting and bidding processes unlikely until the power dynamic alters significantly, many question the necessity of these engagements.

“Perhaps we keep having these meetings because there’s nothing better than free dinners on the company credit card.”

The desire for reform contrasts sharply with the ongoing inertia, positioning the next few months as crucial for any last-minute adaptations prior to another season.