Greg Sankey is performing his duties effectively, though his comments often stir controversy. He addressed reporters in Florida this week ahead of the SEC Spring Meetings, where he is focused on the league’s direction, especially concerning the College Football Playoff’s future. The current format will include 12 teams, but there are expectations for expansion.

While discussing playoff selections, Sankey mentioned that performance in games against teams like Georgia is crucial yet pointed out the controversy surrounding which criteria matter most in selections.

“It’s evident that sometimes not losing becomes more crucial than victories over teams like Georgia.”

Sankey’s approach raises questions about how strength of schedule affects team rankings and playoff spots. He made contrasting statements, emphasizing that teams striving not to lose might overshadow winning against formidable opponents.

In the end, the conversation highlighted the ambiguity over playoff selection criteria that likely continues to challenge the integrity of the competition, drawing attention to how the SEC fabricates narratives within this challenging landscape.