Aaron Rodgers may be heading into his 21st NFL season in 2025, but it won’t be with the New York Jets. The team announced on Thursday that they will release the veteran quarterback ahead of free agency, opening the discussion on where he could land next. This article delves into the potential futures for Rodgers, alongside pros and cons for various teams interested in acquiring him.
Potential Landing Spots for Aaron Rodgers
Indianapolis Colts
Pros: The Colts are likely not ready to give up on Anthony Richardson completely; therefore, renting Rodgers could allow Richardson to learn under an experienced quarterback.
Cons: Introducing Rodgers to the team may hinder Richardson’s opportunity to get playing time.
Las Vegas Raiders
Pros: With plenty of cap space, the Raiders can pursue upgrades across the team and Rodgers brings wealth of experience that could elevate the team’s chances of success immediately.
Cons: The current draft position indicates they might consider a more long-term solution instead of acquiring an aging quarterback.
Minnesota Vikings
Pros: The Vikings are open to replacing their current quarterback with someone of Rodgers’ caliber, potentially setting up an exciting conclusion to his career.
Cons: This acquisition could overshadow the growth of younger players like J.J. McCarthy.
New York Giants
Pros: With an urgent need for competitive gameplay at quarterback, Rodgers’ familiarity with the market may make him an ideal candidate.
Cons: The Giants still have rebuilding to do and should think long-term, often better accomplished through the draft.
Pittsburgh Steelers
Pros: Bringing in Rodgers might align with the Steelers’ current strategy of utilizing seasoned veterans to stay competitive.
Cons: Concerns persist about the long-term viability of such an acquisition given his recent performance.
Tennessee Titans
Pros: Given the Titans’ roster structure, integrating Rodgers could prove beneficial to their immediate prospects in a not-so-competitive division.
Cons: With the first overall pick, the Titans face pressure to decide on a future QB instead.
