Gonzaga’s campaign has generated a unique tournament profile, showing contrasting metrics between predictive measures and resume quality. The Bulldogs rank 11.3 under predictive analytics, while the resume quality metrics average a disappointing 46.3, indicating a probable No. 3 seed in one context and possibly a No. 12 seed in another.

Previously projected as a No. 10 seed, their recent ranking fluctuations hinge on matchups against competing teams, such as BYU.

Key metrics reveal Gonzaga’s scoring margin contributing heavily to its predictive performance. Positioning themselves at No. 2 nationally in this area, only Duke surpasses them.

The team is 2-6 against Quad 1 tiers, with all opponents present in the current tournament forecast; Kentucky holds a seed higher than No. 7. Key victories encompass home wins over Baylor (No. 9 seed) and neutral site wins over Indiana.

Despite relatively favorable scoring metrics, Gonzaga faces challenges in their overall match quality, hence their precarious status on the tournament bubble. Until they manage to contest Saint Mary’s again, their chances of improvement seem limited.